How America’s Export Controls Failed to Keep Cutting-Edge AI Chips from China’s Huawei

An anonymous reader shared this report from the Washington Post:

A few weeks ago, analysts at a specialized technological lab put a microchip from China under a powerful microscope. Something didn’t look right… The microscopic proof was there that a chunk of the electronic components from Chinese high-tech champion Huawei Technologies had been produced by the world’s most advanced chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company.

That was a problem because two U.S. administrations in succession had taken actions to assure that didn’t happen. The news of the breach of U.S. export controls, first reported in October by the tech news site the Information, has sent a wave of concern through Washington… The chips were routed to Huawei through Sophgo Technologies, the AI venture of a Chinese cryptocurrency billionaire, according to two people familiar with the matter, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic… “It raises some fundamental questions about how well we can actually enforce these rules,” said Emily Kilcrease, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security in Washington… Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs confirmed that TSMC recently halted shipments to a “certain customer” and notified the United States after suspecting that customer might have directed its products to Huawei…

There’s been much intrigue in recent days in the industry over how the crypto billionaire’s TSMC-made chips reportedly ended up at Huawei. Critics accuse Sophgo of working to help Huawei evade the export controls, but it is also possible that they were sold through an intermediary, which would align with Sophgo’s denial of having any business relationship with Huawei… While export controls are often hard to enforce, semiconductors are especially hard to manage due to the large and open nature of the global chip trade. Since the Biden administration implemented sweeping controls in 2022, there have been reports of widespread chip smuggling and semiconductor black markets allowing Chinese companies to access necessary chips…

Paul Triolo, technology policy lead at Albright Stonebridge Group, said companies were trying to figure out what lengths they had to go to for due diligence: “The guidelines are murky.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot. Read More

Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *